President Salva Kiir: Please intervene and create Aweil West State separate from Raja
4 min readAn Open Letter to the President of the Republic of South Sudan, H.E. 1st Lt. Gen. Salva Kiir Mayardit: We have trust in you, Mr. President, that your intervention to create Aweil West Sate separately from Raja would bring the peace between Raja and us
February 4, 2017 (SSB) —- Dear Mr. President, with the greatest respect and honor to your esteemed office, we, the concern citizens of the former Aweil West County and former Aweil North County in the diaspora do hereby appeal to you to consider our request to create a separate state that comprises the mentioned above two former counties apart from Raja. Our demand to have a separate state is based on the following facts:
Firstly, since you issued the decree number 36/ 2015 for the creation of 28 states, all Raja chiefs rejected the amalgamation of Raja with the two Aweil counties to establish Lol State with its capital at Raja. The Raja people’s refusal to unite with our two counties is based on the assumption that the Dinka from the two counties would grab their lands and impose their culture on them; which has never been our culture as Aweil people in general.
Secondly, the intellectuals and youths of Aweil West and Aweil North met in Juba last year and appealed to your Excellency to consider the establishment of Aweil West State; which would comprise the two Aweil counties (North and West), and its capital at Nyamlel.
Thirdly, we are keenly aware that you held the official meeting in Juba with the First Vice President and the Vice President regarding the problem of Lol State. Your Excellency, we believe that your meeting with your deputies acknowledged the problems in Lol State and promised to solve it within 21 days. We were optimistic that you would establish the proposed Aweil West state separate from Raja. Unfortunately, we are so disappointed when your Excellency created new states without Aweil West State.
For all these reasons, we, the undersigned this petition, would like to revive our hope by submitting this request to your Excellency to establish our new state. We want to assure you, Mr. President, that we would be living in a peaceful neighborhood with the Raja Community as we used to do so in the past. The peaceful neighborhood is our culture in the entire Aweil region. We have never lived in a hostile neighborhood with the Raja people, and we will never allow our coexistence harmony to come to an end.
We firmly believe that some elements in Raja Community are using the administrative division to jeopardize the long-existed peace between our community and Raja. If this problem is not resolved, it will continue to destabilize Lol State. We have trust in you, Mr. President, that your intervention to create Aweil West Sate separately from Raja would bring the peace between Raja and us. Also, it would deprive the evils to destabilize our area. We thank you in advance Mr. President for considering our people’s request.
Signed by,
Mr. Simon Deng Kuol Deng, United States of America
2. Mr. Isaac Mabior Ngang, United States of America
3. Mr. Kuach Loch Garang Deng, Canada
4. Mr. Kuot Wol Wol Akec, Canada
5. Mr. Jor Wol Jor, United States of America
6. Mr. Yor Anei Yor Wal, United States of America
7. Mr. Angelo Garang Deng Arou, United States of America
8. Mr. Awach Anei Wal, United States of America
9. Mr. Atak Atak Tong Lual, Canada
10. Mr. Daniel Dut Deng Akol, Canada
11. Mr. Peter Pou Magol Deng, United States of America
12. Mr. Garang Kuac Yel, Canada
13. Mr. Kuany Akok Ngor, United States of America
14. Mr. Peter Akec Tong, United States of America
15. Mr. Mario Guot Deng Mou, United States of America
16. Mr. James Ajang Yai, United States of America
17. Mr. Angelo Majok Ayo, Canada
18. Mr. William Deng Boldit, Australia
19. Mr. Jackson Akok Ngor Thiep, Australia
20. Mr. Dut Deng Kuol Anyuan, United Kingdom, England
21. Mr. James Gop Deng Bol, Canada
22. Mr. Leek Akot Machol, United States of America
23. Mr. Wek Wek Lual Majok, Australia
24. Mr. Joseph Majok Amol, United States of America
25. Mr. Samuel Akol Anei, United States of America
26. Mr. James Akoon Ariath, United States of America
27. Mr. Wol Kuac Wol Majok, United States of America
28. Mr. Kuac Akeshak Jok Aleu, Canada
29. Mr. Makuoch Mawien Deng, United States of America
- Lual Tong Lual, Australia
- Malek Dhieu Duang, Australia
- Malek Ayei Majak Ayei, Australia
Copies to:
- First Vice President of the Republic of South Sudan
2. Vice President of the Republic of South Sudan
3. Speaker of Council of States
4. Speaker of Transitional of National Unity Legislative Assembly
5. Governor of Lol State
6. Speaker of Lol Legislative Assembly
The opinion expressed here is solely the view of the writer. The veracity of any claim made are the responsibility of the author, not PaanLuel Wël: South Sudanese Bloggers (SSB) website. If you want to submit an opinion article or news analysis, please email it to paanluel2011@gmail.com. SSB do reserve the right to edit material before publication. Please include your full name, email address, city and the country you are writing from.
About Post Author
RSS SHOULD MAKE DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY PRACTICAL.
BY Awet Benjamin Maker Buong
Nanjing University, Jiangsu Province in China. He can be reach at
awetbenjamin.maker@yahoo.com or
awetbenjaminm@gmail.com
Bringing the public sphere to live will make them engaged in national building if their voices are asked & considered. The problem of democratic design we posed at the outset was whether it is possible to combine inclusion and thoughtfulness. Stated in terms of political principles in Transitional constitution of Republic of South Sudan seems to me as a trademark of what’s not practical as we expected.
I wonder whether it is possible to combine political equality and deliberations through opinions of citizens or should the country be surviving on rebellion and awarding them seats without considering fade-up feeling of those who mandated the leadership through voting in ballot box and if this is the case for how long will this country progress rather than collapsing in rebellion shortcuts ill-gotten policy to ranks & power?
South Sudan government should make deliberative democracy practical to her citizens in national building survey because it’s this civil population who founded this nation as late Dr. John Garang stressed it out in his several speeches in other words SPLM vision of taking town to people got it current saying herein. The citizens of every country are the core foundation for the constitution to work effectively and it’s there constitutional rights to have a say on how the country should be moved forward than being inflicted on messes of self greedy leaders who cares for nothing than their own stomach.
First, if and when this combination is achieved, government should picked up from how inclusive is it?
In what way can it represent all relevant voices or perspectives in the population? Secondly, if and when this combination is achieved, how thoughtful is it? South Sudan government needs to look at specific indicators of deliberative qualities to evaluate it process and actions to ensure that the results really are driven by consideration of merits of competing arguments and not distorted by some pattern of domination or group acting beside president with anger psychology of revenge to some potentials leaders.
Thirdly, if and when this combination is achieved, what effects does it have before making it public? What effects does it have on participants or on the broader public dialogue? And most importantly, can it be situated in the policy process or the public dialogue in such a way that it has some effect on policy?
Lastly but not the least, under what social and political conditions can any of this be accomplished? Even though we have only limited experience as people keep saying we are new nation, but with revival of this deliberative democracy among ordinary citizens whose leaders are their servants, I felt that consulting with them can narrowed this far-wide mistrust between them and their government because they saw themselves suffering and having been forgotten only just to be call out or remember when the election season approaches. I personally account the government wrong about this notion and it’s high time they should switch from that projection.
China achieved it position in the world today just their government give chance of development to her citizens by asking them to give opinions on the following projects
1. Health facilities
2. Roads & bridges
3. Education
4. Agriculture and many more, but their
citizens won the polls on building roads & bridges first to eased connectivity and government has to execute their choices one after the another. In actual sense development belongs to citizens not the government in term of their demands and when you are giving debate to them you’re already on the safe side of constitution and accountability.
This can also help the government from some warmongers who mislead the public on their own way and they achieved it so because the public have lit