PaanLuel Wël Media Ltd – South Sudan

"We the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, with so little, for so long, we are now qualified to do anything, with nothing" By Konstantin Josef Jireček, a Czech historian, diplomat and slavist.

Breakthrough in Addis: Separate Armies for the Transitional Period

10 years ago PaanLuel Wël

South Sudanese rivals to command separate armies during transitional period

November 8, 2014 (ADDIS ABABA) – Rival factional leaders in South Sudan have agreed to command separate forces in the would-be government of national unity during a transitional period in a bit to end the 11-month old civil war in the young country.

The two parties made the progress on Friday in a face-to-face talks between president Salva Kiir and his former deputy, turned opposition leader, Riek Machar, at the Addis Ababa summit of the heads of state and government of the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD).

Opposition leader’s spokesman, James Gatdet Dak, has confirmed to Sudan Tribune on Saturday that the president and the prime minister will command separate forces of the government and rebels, respectively.

“Yes, it is agreed that the president shall be the commander-in-chief of the armed forces currently in government and the prime minister shall be the commander-in-chief of the resistance army, SPLM/SPLA,” Dak explained.

He said the separate commands per the draft agreement sanctioned by IGAD will continue or come into effect from the pre-transitional period into the transitional period until the integration process of the two armies is completed.

Dak however added that mechanisms for integrating the two forces as well as their territories of control, provision of services and functions are yet to be worked out in the security arrangements.

Even though the two principals failed to strike a deal and provide a breakthrough, IGAD officials praised them for agreeing on most of the draft agreement on power-sharing arrangements.

Proponents of the deal said the separate armies would address concerns particularly among the supporters of the rebel group and serve as a confidence building measure during the transitional period.

Observers however fear that the arrangement would be a recipe for another disaster with more devastating consequences should there be a serious disagreement between the two principals in the course of implementation of the would-be peace agreement.

OTHER AREAS OF AGREEMENT

In the draft document seen by Sudan Tribune, the two principals also agreed that the president shall chair the council of ministers, but may delegate it to the prime minister.

The president shall also appoint ministers and presidential advisors “in consultation with and consent of the prime minister in accordance with the peace agreement.”

He shall also chair both the national defence council and the national security council, but to be deputised by the prime minister.

The president shall also direct and supervise foreign policies and ratify international agreements with the approval of the national legislative assembly.

On the other hand, the prime minister shall direct the work of government and oversee preparation and consideration of government business and programs.

The prime minister shall also be in charge of coordination of the implementation of the peace agreement and institutional reforms.

He shall also appoint undersecretaries of the ministries as well as head of public corporations and executive directors of commission, senior civil servants under the undersecretaries, and will ensure implementation of resolutions of the cabinet by relevant ministries, chair cabinet sub-committees as well as present government’s programs and budget to the national parliament.

JOINT EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS

The draft agreement also outlined what it said are joint functions between the president and the prime minister, suggesting the two principles will exercise a joint power to appoint constitutional post holders including state governors, ambassadors and remove governor or dissolve a legislative assembly in an event of a crisis and declare war, among others.

AREAS OF DISAGREEMENT

The main area of disagreement is the leadership structure during the transitional period. While the government wanted positions of vice-president and two deputies to the prime minister.

The opposition group wanted the leadership structure to be the president and the prime minister.

In an event that the two principals seal the deal on the leadership structure and the power-sharing, the parties would then continue to negotiate on the system of governance, security arrangements, reforms as well as issues of accountability and reconciliation.

Meanwhile regional leaders at the summit on Friday gave the two principles 15 days to consult with their constituencies and finalise an agreement on the topic of the leadership structure and power-sharing.

In a resolution passed on Friday, IGAD leaders have threatened the two warring factions with direct regional military intervention and targeted sanctions that would include freezing of individual’s assets, travel ban in the region as well as arms embargo.

About Post Author

PaanLuel Wël

administrator

PaanLuel Wël is the founder and editor-in-chief of PaanLuel Wël Media Ltd, a news website that covers news, opinions, analysis, history, culture and literature of South Sudan and the world. Founded in July 2011 by PaanLuel Wël to create a platform for free expression and constructive dialogue, the website features articles from various contributors, including columnists, commentators, poets, authors, activists and academics. PaanLuel Wël believes that media can play a vital role in informing, educating and empowering the people to participate in nation-building and social transformation. He also believes that media can foster a culture of dialogue, tolerance and diversity among different communities and groups, and hopes to inspire and mentor the next generation of South Sudanese writers and journalists.

See author's posts

Related

Burhan vs Hemedti

In the Crosshairs: The Impacts of Street Fighting in Khartoum, Sudan, on South Sudan

2 years ago PaanLuel Wël

Taking of South Sudan – The New Sentry Report on Corruption in South Sudan, September 2019

5 years ago PaanLuel Wël

Letter to IGAD: C-5 Members of the Independent Boundaries Commission (IBC) Recommend 10 States

5 years ago PaanLuel Wël

Bentiu, UNMISS Camp

11 Years later: Remembering the December 15th Killing in Juba, South Sudan

1 week ago PaanLuel Wël

Hon. Atem Garang Dekuek

Strategic Lessons to South Sudan from the Devastating War in Lebanon

2 weeks ago PaanLuel Wël

James Bidal Bilal is the coordinator for the South Sudan Human Rights Defenders Network (SSHRDN).

Pathways to Improving Human Rights Record in South Sudan

2 weeks ago PaanLuel Wël

The 8th Governor’s Forum – Resolutions and Recommendations, Juba, December 2024

3 weeks ago PaanLuel Wël