South Sudan: A State with the politics for personal interest to rule:
By Mading Abraham Majur, Kampala, Uganda
November 17, 2015 (SSB) —- A unique nature of political system in which the rivalries and struggle of power and willful mow rather that unfriendly institution, ideologies, municipal policies or class interests are fundamental in determining political. It is monopolistic politics as against pluralistic or dual politics.
It is the politics of big men who are substantial distance from the ordinary citizens of South Sudan politics of no accountability, transparency and responsibilities other practices in personal government are conspiracy factional politics and corruption purges.
The ordinary citizens of South Sudan are remembered today by our politicians, a not well thought of system is put in place to difficulty their sufferings. Government claim to know and understand what it is to poor, only the poor understands poverty and it is also the poor that known’s how their paucity could a sick man know where it hurts him. So it stand to reason that the doable alternative to the big man talking the small man what to do is the ordinary man talking the big of his problems and how he think the problems could be solved.
The fact is that the poor usually have quite good perception of their own needs and goal and of what would be required to satisfy and make progress toward them. Government should not presume that they know will benefit the poor better then the poor themselves.
Poverty makes South Sudanese citizens an moral value or abandon values completely, scarcity has create aggravation, loss of hope prospects and values of life loss of the meaning of life officially South Sudan is politically unstable country, it had been championing a violence form ethnic patriotism where the youths are in a virtual state of supporting tribalism among the communities and on the economic front the government of South Sudan is not making clear, it economic policy for one and miscellaneous others.
The point here is not whether, the government or South Sudanese know that we all failed badly, because the policies were not implemented in good faith by our leaders. Does that mean the economic is not suitable for South Sudan? As at now all that the government officials of South Sudan have as economic policy is deficiency mitigation and loot recovery.
We South Sudanese should learn from South Africa, where late Nelson Mandela, choose peace and reconciliation in that country’s of post apartheid government to political blood feud. The reason was being to avoid instability and protect the economy and encourages the unity in South Africa. So the instability of South Sudan is probably the most crucial concerned for South Sudanese citizens as all.
The fact is that this country today is collapsing, there are at the moment perceived naughty ethnic rebellion flexing the muscles and in the process destabilizing the nation and undermining the economic advancement of this country.
The problem is that, it is always poor that end up being the victims of any political disturbance, since the arrival of political independence, South Sudan have been severally traumatized by political upheld.
The author can be via majur20155@gmail.com
The opinion expressed here is solely the view of the writer. The veracity of any claim made are the responsibility of the author, not PaanLuel Wël: South Sudanese Bloggers (SSB) website. If you want to submit an opinion article or news analysis, please email it to paanluel2011@gmail.com. SSB do reserve the right to edit material before publication. Please include your full name, email address and the country you are writing from.
About Post Author
