PaanLuel Wël Media Ltd – South Sudan

"We the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, with so little, for so long, we are now qualified to do anything, with nothing" By Konstantin Josef Jireček, a Czech historian, diplomat and slavist.

Why China and Russia abstain from UNSC resolution on regional force for South Sudan

8 years ago PaanLuel Wël

By Jaya Ramachandran, New York City

UN vs South Sudan

August 15, 2016 (SSB) —- Two of the five veto wielding members of the Security Council, China and Russia, and two from among the ten non-permanent ones, Egypt and Venezuela, abstained from the resolution renewing on August 12 the mandate of the UN Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) until June 30, 2017, authorizing the expansion of peacekeeping forces and stressing the priority of civilian protection in its mandate. The Council adopted a U.S.-drafted resolution that also threatened to impose an arms embargo on South Sudan if the government blocks the deployment of a robust force of 4,000 troops.

All the four abstaining countries faulted that the text of the resolution did not reflect the principles of peace keeping, which included the consent of the South Sudanese authorities. They stressed that consent was a cornerstone of the principles of peacekeeping. Egypt went further and bashed what it called the Council’s “increasing tendency to overstep the established principles governing United Nations peacekeeping operations”.

While the four shared in principle the concern of the 11 Security Council members who voted in favour of the resolution, the Council document SC/12475 provides a summary of the reasons of those who preferred to abstain:

Stressing that African people should resolve African issues in an African way, China’s Permanent Representative to the UN in New York, Liu Jieyi, expressed support for the lead role that the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) was playing in South Sudan.

As the situation was “still very severe and complicated”, the international community must make efforts to bring the parties back to the trajectory of implementing the peace agreement. The regional protection force established by the resolution must conduct full consultations with the Transitional Government of National Unity and obtain its agreement.

Liu said his country had abstained from the vote because the principles of peacekeeping had not been reflected in the Council’s text. Noting that the African Union’s Peace and Security Council would hold a conference on August 18 to discuss the deployment of the regional protection force, he expressed hope that all parties at the meeting would reach a consensus on key issues.

Petr Iliichev, Deputy Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN said his delegation had abstained because agreement had not been reached on such key issues as the consent of the South Sudanese authorities.

Stressing that consent was a cornerstone of the principles of peacekeeping and was also critical for practical reasons, he said paragraph 10 of the resolution should be implemented in close cooperation with Juba and called on both the IGAD and the UN to work constructively with the Government.

Paragraph 10 of the resolution stresses the need “to advance in cooperation with the Transitional Government of National Unity the safety and security of the people of South Sudan and to create an enabling environment for implementation of the Agreement”.

Egypt’s Minister Plentipotentiary at the Permanent Mission to the UN, Ihab Awad said his delegation had abstained due to its reservations over what it saw as the Council’s increasing tendency to overstep the established principles governing United Nations peacekeeping operations.

Recalling the adoption several weeks ago of resolution 2303 (2016), which had authorized the deployment of a police unit in Burundi without that Government’s consent, he stressed that Government consent was a practical and logistical necessity as well as a legal one.

In the context of South Sudan, the Council had adopted a resolution that disregarded the views of the Transitional Government of National Unity as well as the IGAD statement emphasizing coordination with the Government.

The text had considered the South Sudanese Government’s agreement “in principle” but without holding direct consultations, and, in what amounted to extortion, it threatened further measures in case of the Government’s non-compliance.

Expressing support for UMISS and its work, as well as for the efforts of IGAD to bring peace to South Sudan, he said Egypt had attempted to reach a compromise on the text. Regrettably, such last-ditch efforts at achieving unity had not borne fruit.

Swift action in South Sudan was important and it required the utmost care to avoid approaches that could undermine the political process or return the country and the region into a cycle of violence, he added.

Venezuela’s representative said he had not voted in favour of the text as it had been drafted without consulting with the Transitional Government. In that regard, the deployment of the regional protection force would worsen the situation on the ground. Calling upon the Council members to respect the principle of sovereignty, he stressed the need for more diplomacy and dialogue and less threats and sanctions.

South Sudan

Taking floor, South Sudan’s Permanent Representative Akuei Bona Malwal recalled that his delegation had provided an official response on the mandate adopted on August 12, expressed his rejection of the text as it did not take into account or even consider the views of his Government.

South Sudan had, in good faith, accepted in principle the deployment of the protection force as stated at the second IGAD Plus summit on August 5. His Government did not object to the entire draft of the resolution, but only to the new elements of the protection force and the pre-empting of the meeting between the Government and the Regional Chief of Defence Staff.

The August 5 IGAD communiqué had clearly outlined that the modalities of that force, including its composition, mandate, armament, deployment, timing and funding, would be agreed upon by the Transitional Government of National Unity and the troop-contributing countries, South Sudan’s representative said. It was also unfortunate that the resolution contained an annex on an arms embargo, given that the resolution was a peacekeeping text.

“The adoption of this resolution goes against the basic principle of United Nations peacekeeping operations, which is the consent of the main parties to the conflict,” he said concurring with Egypt, adding that it also went against the principles of respect for sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of States enshrined in the United Nations Charter. [IDN-InDepthNews – 14 August 2016]

About Post Author

PaanLuel Wël

administrator

PaanLuel Wël is the founder and editor-in-chief of PaanLuel Wël Media Ltd, a news website that covers news, opinions, analysis, history, culture and literature of South Sudan and the world. Founded in July 2011 by PaanLuel Wël to create a platform for free expression and constructive dialogue, the website features articles from various contributors, including columnists, commentators, poets, authors, activists and academics. PaanLuel Wël believes that media can play a vital role in informing, educating and empowering the people to participate in nation-building and social transformation. He also believes that media can foster a culture of dialogue, tolerance and diversity among different communities and groups, and hopes to inspire and mentor the next generation of South Sudanese writers and journalists.

See author's posts

Related

The 8th Governor’s Forum – Resolutions and Recommendations, Juba, December 2024

3 weeks ago PaanLuel Wël

Upper Nile Region from 1897 under Anglo-EgyptiansMilitary Rule with Civil Colonial Natives Administrations

1 month ago PaanLuel Wël

Ariik Atekdit

The Truthful Storytelling of Lou Ariik and Its Ongoing Conflict in Tonj, South Sudan

2 months ago PaanLuel Wël

Bentiu, UNMISS Camp

11 Years later: Remembering the December 15th Killing in Juba, South Sudan

1 week ago PaanLuel Wël

Hon. Atem Garang Dekuek

Strategic Lessons to South Sudan from the Devastating War in Lebanon

2 weeks ago PaanLuel Wël

James Bidal Bilal is the coordinator for the South Sudan Human Rights Defenders Network (SSHRDN).

Pathways to Improving Human Rights Record in South Sudan

2 weeks ago PaanLuel Wël

The 8th Governor’s Forum – Resolutions and Recommendations, Juba, December 2024

3 weeks ago PaanLuel Wël