Has Thomas Cirilo finally realized the importance of the enemy of my enemy is my friend?

Posted: September 11, 2019 by PaanLuel Wël Media Ltd. in Commentary, Contributing Writers, Junub Sudan, Opinion Articles, Opinion Writers

By Clement Maring Samuel, Kampala, Uganda

Pagan amum, Paul Malong Awan, Thomas Chirillo, Chirino Hiteng and Oyai Deng Ajak launch the South Sudan Opposition Movement in the Netherlands
Pagan amum, Paul Malong Awan, Thomas Chirillo, Chirino Hiteng and Oyai Deng Ajak launch the South Sudan Opposition Movement in the Netherlands

Wednesday, September 11, 2019 (PW) — When I read a tripartite agreement signed by Gen. Thomas Cirilo; Gen. Pagan Amum Okiech; and Gen. Paul Malong Awan who represented their parties of SSNDA; R-SPLM, and SSUF in the Netherlands on August 30th 2019, it was a surprise to see Gen. Thomas Cirilo Swaka succumbing to the philosophy of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”. At last he has come to realization that joining hands with a political foe is strength. NAS has swallowed its bitter pills of describing some Equatorians who join hands with Gen. Paul Malong weirdly. When the FDS were arrested in Juba and kept in detention for couple of weeks, it was Dr. Riak Machar who heralded for their release, but after they were released, they abandoned him and treated him as a war monger disregarding the effort he did for them. Their decision has led to prolongation of the war. Had they join hands together with Dr. Riak Machar; the war would have ended long time ago. They haven’t use the philosophy of the enemy of my enemy is my friend.  

When Dr. Riak Machar was detained in South Africa, the SPLM-IO became a standstill Movement. In this period, on 27th March 2018, SSUF conceives eleven members from Bahr el Ghazal, Equatoria and Upper Nile to form a revolutionary Movement. These eleven members constitute the founding body of SSUF/A. On 28th March 2018, SSUF gave birth to a new Movement called “South Sudan united Front and Army (SSUF/A)” in Nairobi, Kenya. After its formation, the members chose Gen. Paul Malong Awan from greater Bahr el Ghazal as Chairman and commander in Chief. SSUF/A was committed to remove the regime in Juba militarily and the task requests joint efforts from all opposition forces which took arms against Juba regime. Gen. Paul Malong relied heavily to make alliance with Gen. Pagan Amum Okiech; Gen. Oyai Deng Ajak; and Gen Thomas Cirilo including the non armed groups headed by Gabriel Sangsong Sang. There wasIntellectual resistance from SSOA members who described Gen. Malong as an uneducated leader to ally with. Besides, they were afraid of being targeted by TROIKA on the issue of sanction of Gen Paul Malong. The long awaited Generals made SSUF/A a standstill Mill which delayed the Military and political structures. This contributed to the founding members of SSUF leaving the Movement like Ambassador Telar, Lino Ajang, Clement Maring, Ambassador Lumumba, Elly Magok, Ambassador Ayok, and Simon Wieu, later followed by Ustaz Lewis Anei.

The SSOA groups headed by Gabriel Sangsong sang have chosen a non-violent approach to address the conflict in South Sudan and they were not ready to join hands with Gen Paul Malong, a person viewed like an owl in the company of birds. SSOA was over taken by the peace overtone in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. In SSOA consortium, only Gabriel Sangsong Sang had the collaborative view to include SSUF into peace talks, but the rest of SSOA members vehemently rejected inclusion of SSUF into peace talks.  Ninety-nine percent of former SSOA members vehemently rejected SSUF’s participation in peace talks and Bakosoro boys were not happy with the activities of Mathiang Anyor Forces in Western Equatoria. Thomas Cirilo’s NAS wanted Gen. Paul Malong to fight in Bahr el Ghazal and leave Equatoria for NAS; he wanted SSUF and NAS to cooperate on logistic aspects and they should converge in Juba. This position is procrastinating because the seat of the power is not in Bahr el Ghazal but in Juba. Gen. Thomas Cirilo thinks he can remove the regime in Juba alone. SSUF then resisted the regime alone after been denied to participate in peace talks by IGAD, TROIKA and SSOA.

It was only Gabriel Sangsong Sang who cooperated with SSUF members who were sent to Addis Ababa to participate in the peace talks. SSUF committee was not allowed to participate in the peace talks; SSUF members only attended the governance and security workshop which was organized by IGAD prior to the actual days of the peace talks. With cooperation of Hon. Gabriel Sangsong Sang, one member of SSUF Hon. Elly Magok fully attended the peace talks to the end. Gabriel Sangsong Sang was the only leader among SSOA who held an inclusive view to bring sustainable peace in the country, but the rest of the leaders were only greedily contented with their positions in Juba.

Malong as a person made many mistakes by implementing the Jieng Council of Elders agenda when he was the General Chief of Staff under President Kiir in Juba which made many people to reject his Movement as the savage memories of the Mathiang Anyor militia in Equatoria and in upper Nile Regions were fresh in their minds. The South Sudanese held Gen. Paul Malong as the catalyst for maiming people in South Sudan and for maintaining President Salva Kiir Mayardit in power, but again the opposing leaders didn’t realize the importance of making alliance with an enemy to remove a common enemy. They did not conceive the ancient proverb which says: “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”.The proverb suggests that two opposing parties even if they are enemies of themselves can work together against their common enemy.

In World War II, this concept was used by the Americans, British and Russians who teamed up against Hitler. The idea of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” functions in various guises as foreign policy by Allied powers during the Second World War. In Europe, tension was common between the Western Allies and the Soviet Union. Despite their inherent differences, they recognized a need to work together to meet the threat of Nazi aggression under leadership of Adolf Hitler. Both US President Franklin D. Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill were wary of the Soviet Union under the leadership of Joseph Stalin. However, both developed policies with an understanding that Soviet cooperation was necessary for the Allied war effort to succeed.

Similar alliance could have been forged between SPLM-IO, FDs, SSOA and SSUF against the regime in Juba, but they nurtured their differences to tear them apart which strengthened the grip of the regime in Juba to defeat them all. Gen. Paul Malong after been removed from power automatically became an enemy of the regime. Smart Revolutionaries could have use the philosophy of an enemy of my enemy is my friend to ally with him regardless of their differences they harbor to remove the regime in Juba. The crimes of Gen. Paul Malong could be address when peace is at hand in the country, but greedy leaders could not comprehend this sense. When peace is at hand, all criminals will be exposed including those who are hiding behind the curtain.

When the author joined hands with Gen. Paul Malong in 2018 to fight the regime in Juba, it was based on the notion that the enemy of my enemy is my friend which Gen. Thomas has now realized, there was nothing common apart from this view, but some members of NAS conjoined with Hakim Dario of PDM vilified the Equatorians in SSUF as followers of Dinka, enemies of Equatoria, traitors, betrayers, Satans, Devils, opportunists, bought, sellouts, partners in crime. Now that Gen Thomas Cirilo who represented SSDA has join hands with Gen. Paul Malong, Are they followers of Dinka and enemies of Equatoria? Are they traitors and betrayers of Equatorians? Are they Satans and devils? Are they opportunists?  Are they bought by Malong? Are they sellouts and partners in crime? Isn’t that politics? Have they forgotten that politics is a game? What is the gameness of politics? Do they play the game with angels or with Devils?  Well, what do we say then in this rejoining? “A dog returns to its vomit” and “A washed pig returns to the mud”. Henceforth, after this nuptial with Gen. Paul Malong, let the big mouth hypocrites shut up describing people with variant views unfairly. The realization of coming together is strength. Therefore, since the tripartite alliance aims for peace, it is welcome.  Al salaam Aleichum!

The author is a former SSUF/A senior member, Former Deputy Governor, Former Minister of Education, Former Commissioner. He lives in Kampala, can be reach on warun1maring@gmail.com.

The opinion expressed here is solely the view of the writer. The veracity of any claim made is the responsibility of the author, not PaanLuel Wël Media (PW) website. If you want to submit an opinion article, commentary or news analysis, please email it to paanluel2011@gmail.com. PaanLuel Wël Media (PW) website do reserve the right to edit or reject material before publication. Please include your full name, a short biography, email address, city and the country you are writing from.

  1. John Mayen says:

    Nicely written article, but the views expressed here reflect the concealed hatred, from a former Senior Govt official of the Govt SS, of some SS members/groups.

    Why linked Maloung and his former roles/duties to Jieny instead of seeing this as of head of the army implementing state security policies – to prevent and deter rebellion and violent: things that are very common to disgruntled and dismissed former govt’s official of SS who are the real enemies of the people of the SS.

    When they (former Govt’s officers) are in The Govt – and their big luxurious office-chairs and under performing, they are very happy but when removed (a common thing all of the world) they become disgruntled – releasing their satanic-primitive nurture of using tribes to commit violence against the people so that they are again appeased and rewarded for their violence or inciting violence so that they are returned to govt’s positions.

    The author, though tries to conceal his motives, has revealed this gruesome nurture of former SS govt officials.

    There is nothing evil than calling for violence against vulnerable people of SS, and Maloung, though claimed to be uneducated but better than those claiming to be educated, should be very careful and conscious of these primitive- hatred individuals.

    You cannot compare the WWII – Cold War Western foreign policies against state internal rebellion. Those policies were (and still used) used to defeat the feared State or ideology and to promote the common values of the Western- colonial societies.

    No Western States allow any form of internal rebellious or dissent, and if any then it is savagely and cruelly dealt with very quickly so that it is removed, contained and used as a deterrent against future crime and violence. The author is very stupid to use this as an example of encouraging collective violence against their own govt and vulnerable people of SS.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s