Failure to pay civil servants and the army is sabotage against the government of South Sudan

Failure to pay civil servants, public officials and members of organized forces on time without clear reasons is sabotage against the government.

By Hon. Juol Nhomngek Daniel, Juba, South Sudan

Friday, 19 January 2024 (PW) — Many citizens and the general public remain perplexed by the inconsistent conduct of the Hon. Minister of Finance and Economic Planning. Only critical thinkers and analysts can understand from the inference that the Minister must have a mission to accomplish or act under the instruction of an undisclosed principal.  

I repeat, the Minister has a Mission that the National Security supports or fears to tackle due to some considerations. National Security must protect the integrity of the system and fight against any person whose actions affect the system. However, one wonders why the security sector is silent about the current induced sufferings of the citizens.

As I have stated in the opening paragraph, there must be a group behind the Minister who have identified and appointed him to implement their agenda because of his eloquence in public speaking. The group that lobbied for his appointment must have agenda and the Minister is the perfect candidate to implement that agenda through smoothing the public into silence with nice public speaking. The Minister is wrong as he should not the people for granted and play with their psychology.

It is wrong for the Minister to preach and promise the public something that does not exist. At least the Minister, as a representative of the Government, must be honest in order to maintain the trust of the public in the system. Empty promises erode the public confidence in the system as the system’s operation is affected when the public does not trust it.

The Minister does not have excuses not to pay government employees in all sectors in living wage and on time.  As we all know, the issue of South Sudan is not lack of resources as it has been marked as one of the richest countries in the world in terms of natural resources. The riches of South Sudan are seen in the influx and the presence of foreigners to this country who become rich within the blink of the eye. 

The only problem as we can see and now understand now why South Sudan is being ranked as one of the poorest countries in the world is the action of some of its government officials. The government officials like the Minister of Finance and Economic Planning does not support the local investment in the people and in small businesses. This is why poverty keeps on growing within the Country. How will the country develop if resources are misallocated?

 The resources of South Sudan are not allocated according to priorities. The priorities of any government are salaries and other benefits of employees, services or operational costs of the government and capital for development for five sectors namely, physical infrastructure, agricultural, educational and healthy sectors. Security sector is not listed here because it is the heart of the government that takes precedence and it does not need to be listed as an automatic need that cannot be compromised.

 However, as the facts indicate, budget for the operation is now prioritized over salaries and capital expenditure for development. This affects effective service delivery. Due to the lack of effective services, insecurity that needs government intervention is not able to be controlled because of the lack of enough resources. Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning, which is at the heart of government fails to pay according to the budget lines to other Government Spending agencies, which affect their effectiveness and production in the country.

The lack of production results from the failure to invest in strategic economic sectors besides the failure to improve working conditions for civil servants, public officials and members of organized forces. Poor payments in the public sector has created extreme poor working conditions for the government workforce and it has also become a major source of corruption.

This affects the ability of the system to operate efficiently. It may not to be an over exaggeration to say that in South Sudan, working according to the system of the government makes people poorer than those who are just sitting under trees while making shadow deals with their line of connections inside the government. The government is supposed to give priority to the welfare of its citizens by paying them in accordance with regional standards.

 As it is the fact in South Sudan, not only that the government officials, civil servants and members of organized forces are paid poorly but they are also paid in meagre and moreover in arrears. Failure to pay government workforce in living wage and on time is not acceptable because it is killing the government without the government knowing it. As my research indicates from the informal research that I made across South Sudan, all states are now going to six months without being paid while the government workforce in Juba is going to five months.

Despite the failure to pay and improve the conditions of workforce, the Minister of Finance keeps on giving false promises that create fake hopes in the workforce. The question is, what is the problem or why is not the government able to pay almost all its workforce on time and with living wage? The answer to this question though it is obvious, may not be answered by many of us openly because of fear of reprisal from the beneficiaries of the system.

The beneficiaries of the system of government in South Sudan have a firm control over all resources and the people. They do not care about the welfare of citizens nor the government workforce and the development of this country.  What they only care is about to get out of the system despite the costs it can inflict on the public. They have established firm control to the extent that and other government officials who are less connected are not able to complain and talk loudly against the vices that deny them their rights because of fear.

As a result, the system is being run on rumours. The government is being criticised behind closed doors while at the same time those criticising the government are looking out for the opportunities to enter and cheat the system. It is very unfortunate that the way the system has shaped our ideology it will take time for this country to be righted. It needs all of us constant struggle as we confront the system.  

The worse part of our system is that it has killed patriotism as the country is being run on the wishes of the strong lobby groups that emerge in major towns across South Sudan. Currently, individuals lobby for the replacement of those in the system with their trusted relatives or friends that in turn have to compensate them with resources accordance with the lobby agreement. It is not therefore a surprise that it becomes a crime to talk openly against malpractices.

For one to talk against the failures of and malpractices in the government, one has to find a secured or exclusive place while on guard against the agents or informants of beneficiaries of the system who employ them in all the corners to look out for those who complain about the violations of their rights and take such complaints as raw as it is to the relevant authorities as they capitalize on them to benefit more irrespective of the merits of those complaints.

From the above discussion, we can see that failure to pay civil servants, government officials and the members of organized forces with living wage and on time without across South Sudan is the deliberate move from the beneficiaries of the system to harm the government. The move is being implemented by their agent in the government such as the Minister of Finance and Economic Planning who has now proved to be a forerunner in creating false hopes in the general public.

The Minister of Finance always says one thing publicly and does completely different thing practically. This is why it is not hard to come to the conclusion that the Minister is implementing the agenda of no pay to destroy the system. It is good that the Minister of Finance and Economic Planning cannot tell us that the country does not have resources unless he accounts for the whereabouts of our national incomes from the sources under Article 177 (2) of the Transitional Constitution, 2011 as amended.

Article 177 (2) referred to above provides that the National Government shall legislate for raising revenue or collecting taxes from (a) oil and mineral revenue;  (b) national personal income tax; (c) corporate and business profit tax; (d) customs duties and import taxes; (e) airports and river transport revenue; (f) service charges, fees and fines; (g) national government enterprises and projects; (h) value added tax or general sales tax on goods and services; (i) excise duties; (j) loans and borrowing from the Bank of South Sudan and the public; (k) grants-in-aid and foreign financial assistance;  (l) fees from nationality, passports, immigration and visas;  (m) royalties; and (n) any other tax or revenue as may be determined by law.

The National Parliament enacted the National Revenue Authority Act which established the National Revenue Authority some years back and it has been in charge of collecting national revenues in coordination with State Revenue Authorities. Hence, for the Minister to convince us and to stop us from blaming him of deliberately failing to part the workforce as part of hidden agenda, he must publicly present the audited report that will explain total revenues collected from the sources of our national income as provided for under Article 177 (2) of the Transitional Constitution.

Without doing what I have recommended above but keeps on promising all earth and heaven but delivering nothing amounts to a breach of the doctrine of legitimate expectation under the law. The doctrine of legitimate expectation was first developed in English law as a ground of judicial review in administrative law to protect a procedural or substantive interest when a public authority rescinds from a representation made to a person.

The Minister is therefore acting inappropriately by failing to uphold not only the trust public has in him but also his profession as the Doctor of Philosophy (PhD Holder) who satisfied the requirement for the award of such a Doctorate and is now able to teach in the Public University like University of Juba. The actions of the Minister of being inconsistent are morally wrong and he should just resign to save his academic values and image.

Moreover, he is acting in the violation of the rights of the citizens as he has taken the public for granted. Our right as citizens is to condemn such moral ambiguity as it is destroying the only government we have. It is eroding our trust in the Minister and above all in the system. We must call a spade a spade but not a big spoon. As we go on shying away from telling the truth in order to find the solution on how to deal with issues concerning the bad economic conditions in this country and how to concretely agree on how to improve the economic system and the welfare of our people, we can let the country into the bleak future of our national economy.

As citizens, we have the duty to protect the system and the constitution. No one will come from outside this country to improve our welfare by solving the economic crises except us by taking courage and go to Hon. Aleu Ayieny Aleu’s way of calling a black a black. We must call black a black not the white though we know that the colour is black. The truth telling and concrete actions can save the government and the system from violent collapse under heavy weights of economic crises.

The economic crises in South Sudan are not external rather they behavioural in nature. They are product of human activities in satisfying personal interest at the expense of the nation and because of that they need human solutions. For instance, failure to pay civil servants, failure to pay members of organized forces and government officials, failure to pay security personnel to control rampant insecurity in many areas of South Sudan caused by intra and intercommunal violence, cattle raids and theft are all human behaviour that needs both force and moral approach.

As the country is bleeding from induced failure by the government to pay its workers that render the system incapable to perform, some individuals and government officials in the heart of the system are getting paid with the amount of money in a day for the work that they have not done that can pay South Sudan workforce for more than a year. Criminal acts are legalized as some government officials and their friends register and own fictitious companies that are purposely registered to defraud the government.

The national budget that is supposed to guide and control the expenditures of the government is not adhered as well as the rules of procurements that are there purposely to ensure the value for money are deliberately ignored as only twisted to cheat the government through the sham process to the detriment of the workforce and general public. All these show that the economic crises we are facing in this country are induced rather out of honest error or being used by individuals as the tools to weaken and destroy the government.

We must therefore watch out and monitor the conduct of individuals in government who are taking advantage of the economic crises caused by lack of improving economic conditions of the people. In fact, if we critically study and analyse what is happening in South Sudan currently such as rampant corruption protected by security apparatuses, support to intra and intercommunal violence, scarcity of hard currency or hoarding of hard currency, existence of illegal group called them Toronto that snatches phones and other valuable assets from the innocent members of the public and South Sudanese citizens, unreasonable delay of payment of salaries of civil servants and members of the organized forces, we can conclude that they are part of the insurgent techniques intended to provoke the anger and uprising by the public against the government.

The question is what is insurgency in the context of South Sudan as we see at play currently?  According to the CIA Guide to the Analysis of Insurgency, insurgency is a protracted political-military activity directed toward completely or partially controlling the resources of a country through the use of irregular military forces and illegal political organizations and activities such as guerrilla warfare, terrorism, and political mobilization and propaganda, recruitment, front and covert party organization, and international activity.

In other words, as the Joint Publication 3-24 on Counterinsurgency published on 25 April 2018 and validated 30 April 2021 by the United States of America Department of the Navy defines it, the insurgency is the organized use of subversion and violence to seize, nullify, or challenge political control of a region or the whole country. The success of insurgency is to understand the perceptions and behaviour of the relevant populations that can substantially help or hinder the success of a campaign, operation, or tactical action by the insurgents.

The major goal of insurgent activities is to create the atmosphere for change in the system by weakening the government control and legitimacy while increasing insurgent control and legitimacy by certain leaders behind the insurgent activities who portray themselves as the political Messiah while in fact are the one behind all the crisis. The common denominator of most insurgent goal is the desire to spread desperation among the population so that it blindly supports any change of the system.

The ultimate political objectives of insurgent groups through their subversion activities are essentially to—limit the ability of the government and enhance their capability in providing public services; obtain the support of the majority or neutrality of critical segments of the population that can protect the system; isolate the government from international diplomatic and material support while increasing their international support; increase domestic and international legitimacy of the insurgent organization at the expense of the government; destroy the self-confidence of government leaders and cadres, causing their abdication or withdrawal; reduce and;  if possible, neutralize government coercive power while strengthening insurgent coercive capabilities.

In summary, the Minister of Finance and Economic Planning’s failure to pay civil servants, public officials and members of organized forces on time without clear reasons is a sabotage against the government. If the Minister believes in his integrity, then he has to resign or improve his style of management and begin paying civil servants, public officials and civil servants.

The author, Hon. Juol Nhomngek Daniel, is a member of the National Parliament (TNLA) representing Cueibet County in Lakes State on the SPLM-IO ticket. He is a lawyer specializing in Constitution law and human rights and can be reached through: nhomngekjuol@gmail.com

About Post Author