Both SPLM-IG’s No-extension and SPLM-IO’s Extension Proposals are Meant to Avoid 2024 Elections

Neither SPLM-IG’s No-extension nor SPLM-IO’s Extension Proposals is Meant for the 2024 Election

By Zechariah Makuach Maror, Juba, South Sudan

Sunday, 24 March 2024 (PW) — As the stalemate surrounding the scheduling of elections in South Sudan persists, the political landscape remains complex and contentious. The two main parties involved, the SPLM-IO and the SPLM-IG (Mainstream SPLM), have deliberately proposed differing solutions, both ultimately leading to a delay in the electoral process.

South Sudan’s history is marred by conflict, political instability, and the struggle for independence from Sudan, followed by internal power struggles after gaining independence in 2011. The civil war that erupted in 2013 between President Salva Kiir’s government (SPLM Mainstream) and opposition forces led by Dr. Riek Machar’s SPLM-IO further exacerbated ethnic divisions rooted in the country’s past.

The Revitalized Agreement on Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (R-ARCSS), signed in 2018, aimed to end the violence and pave the way for unity and a peaceful transition to democracy.

Personal and political motivations play a significant role in shaping the positions of the various parties. President Salva Kiir, leader of the SPLM Mainstream, has faced criticism for his leadership style and handling of the country’s affairs. Dr. Riek Machar, leader of the SPLM-IO, has also been accused of pursuing his own interests at the expense of the country’s stability.

Despite the peace agreement, implementing key provisions, including scheduling elections, has faced numerous challenges. The SPLM-IO, considered the main opposition party and a signatory to the agreement, has been vocal in its calls for postponing elections, citing the need for further reforms and the lack of readiness for a free and fair electoral process.

On the other hand, the SPLM Mainstream has recently proposed partial elections, focusing on presidential and gubernatorial seats while delaying legislative elections.

It is evident that neither the SPLM-IO nor the SPLM Mainstream is truly in favor of holding elections as scheduled, raising concerns about their commitment to democratic principles, the R-ARCSS, and the will of the South Sudanese people.

Both parties appear to be engaging in a ploy of creating confusion among the population by debating the extension or no-extension mantra, a tactic that only serves to further bamboozle the citizens eagerly awaiting elections, regardless of their perceived quality.

The SPLM-IO, despite claiming to be the main opposition party, seems unsatisfied with its role and focused on securing power and resources for itself, rather than fully embracing its role as a check on the government. This is troubling for South Sudan’s democratic aspirations.

The SPLM Mainstream, on the other hand, has not adequately addressed the real concerns that many identify as impediments to the scheduled 2024 elections, such as persistent rebellions, intercommunal violence, and the lack of funding for crucial electoral preparations.

Despite the looming deadline, the SPLM Mainstream has not expressed a genuine desire for elections to be held as scheduled by the R-ARCSS Road Map.

The other political parties in the revitalized government seem to be following the lead of the two dominant SPLMs, rather than charting their own course. This concentration of power in the hands of a few individuals is a worrying development for democracy in South Sudan.

The impact of the stalemate surrounding the scheduling of elections extends beyond the political elite and has significant implications for the future of South Sudan. The lack of progress risks undermining the fragile peace process and could reignite tensions and conflict within the country.

The South Sudanese people, who have already suffered greatly, now face further uncertainty and delays in the transition to a stable and democratic government.

While the SPLM-IO’s call for postponement may have merit in terms of ensuring an inclusive and transparent electoral process, the lack of concrete steps towards achieving this goal raises questions about the party’s commitment to democratic values.

The SPLM Mainstream’s proposal for partial elections falls short of addressing the underlying issues plaguing South Sudan’s political landscape.

All parties involved in the peace process must prioritize the interests of the South Sudanese people and work towards a truly inclusive electoral process. The international community must also remain engaged and hold all parties accountable for their actions.

The success of South Sudan’s transition to democracy will depend on the willingness of its leaders to put aside personal interests and work towards building a more peaceful and prosperous future for the country and its people.

Despite the challenges and imperfections of the electoral process, the desire for participation and hope for change continue to drive the South Sudanese to seek out elections, even flawed ones. While focusing on the fairness or unfairness of the upcoming elections may not be the most productive approach, conducting them could provide valuable experiences and lessons for planning and organizing subsequent free and fair elections.

In conclusion, the road to free and fair elections in South Sudan is challenging, marked by deep-seated political divisions and historical grievances. However, by fostering dialogue, building trust, upholding democratic principles, and embracing patriotism over self-interest, the country can overcome its past and chart a new course towards a more equitable and participatory electoral system, if there is a genuine willingness for elections, not extensions.

It is essential for all stakeholders to remain committed to this goal and to work towards a future where elections are seen as a catalyst for positive change and national unity, rather than a source of conflict.

The writer is an Activist and can be reached at zeemakuach@hotmail.com.

If you want to submit an opinion article, commentary, or news analysis, please email it to the editor: info@paanluelwel.com or paanluel2011@gmail.com. PaanLuel Wël Media (PW) website does reserve the right to edit or reject material before publication. Please include your full name, a short biography, email address, city, and the country you are writing from.

About Post Author