South Sudan: How to start a nation

Trappings of state: Getting a brand new country off the ground is a fiddly business.

SOUTH SUDAN chose its new national anthem in democratic style. In a packed concert hall in Juba, the young state’s scruffy capital, rival choirs performed their entries. Purists argued that the winner’s tune did not fit its lyrics. But the decision has laid down one stone on the road to statehood. Less fun lies ahead. Hooking up with the international system’s buried wiring involves gaining everything from telephone dialling codes to internet suffixes, via postal connections, air-traffic control and trade tariffs.

A foreign service is already taking shape. Around 100 southerners worked as Sudanese diplomats; diaspora members already man outposts in many countries. More staff are needed. Outsiders are hurrying to help. Independent Diplomat, a charity, is advising the new state. Austria is offering five places at the world’s oldest diplomatic school in Vienna.

Their first task is formal but vital: to gain diplomatic recognition. Notching up all 190-odd countries will take time—Estonia, which regained independence in 1991, has relations with only 170, most recently formalising ties with Haiti in 2010. But recognition from the world’s main governments (and the likely lack of any opposing voices) enables a vital step: membership of the United Nations.

South Sudan will tread a path already navigated in recent years by East Timor, Eritrea, Slovakia, and the ex-Yugoslav and ex-Soviet republics that had big-country blessings on their birth. The process is hardly glamorous: new countries do not get an embossed birth certificate or a fanfare. Instead, the Editorial, Terminology and Reference Service of the United Nations Documentation Division will enter the state in “Country Names”—a pamphlet that lists in six languages the popular and formal names of full UN member nations. Outsiders such as Abkhazia, Kosovo, Northern Cyprus and Western Sahara have to make do with a place on lesser lists, such as those compiled for less political purposes by the UN Statistics Division.

The listing in New York sets many wheels turning. It grants a spot in ISO 3166-1, a directory compiled by the Geneva-based International Standards Organisation. This list converts national names into two- and three-letter codes (AFG for Afghanistan; ZWE for Zimbabwe). These codes will help sort the new state’s international post, mark out its citizens in immigration databases and allow the South Sudan pound to feature on international exchanges when it launches in July. The national top-level domains used in web addresses (like “.fr” for France and “.de” for Germany) are usually the same as the ISO two-letter codes. South Sudan’s web sites may have the sinister if logical “.ss” suffix.

International telephone codes are allocated by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), a UN agency also based in Geneva. It will grant the South Sudanese a dialling code, replacing Sudan’s +249. (Eritrea, until now Africa’s newest country, is +291, so +292 could be for South Sudan.) The ITU also divvies up radio wavelengths. A South Sudanese space-satellite programme may still be some way off, but the new country will have a place in the weighty Master International Frequency Register.

Before South Sudan’s new diplomats relax on the cocktail circuit, they will also need to establish ties with a long list of other outfits. The International Civil Aviation Organisation deals not just with air travel, but will also help the new government issue machine-readable passports. The Universal Postal Union will allow the country’s new postage stamps (eagerly awaited by philatelists) to convey letters abroad.

That is a big hurdle for would-be countries outside the fold: Somaliland’s mail often comes via Ethiopia; Palestine’s post until recently had to go through Israel; until 2008 post between Taiwan and mainland China went via Hong Kong or Macau. South Sudan has no coastline, but it may well join the International Maritime Organisation, much preoccupied these days with piracy in nearby waters. Around half the world’s landlocked states belong to the body.

Textbooks, encyclopedias and wall maps may take time to catch up with the new country. Some cash-strapped libraries still use atlases showing fossils such as the Soviet Union and the German Democratic Republic. But after decades of struggling for independence, South Sudan is not short of patience.

When South Sudan was welcomed into the United Nations on July 14, the organization’s press office declared it “the world’s newest state.” But the UN knows well that such declarations are thorny at best. State, nation or country – there is no legal definition of the place stamped on the cover of a passport. Adding South Sudan means that there are 193 member states of the United Nations. But that doesn’t answer the question of how many countries there are in the world.

What makes a country?

Denis Seguin

From Saturday’s Globe and Mail

Published Friday, Jul. 29, 2011 7:38PM EDT

A new flag raised: South Sudan celebrates birth

Put that question to the United Nations and the answer, essentially, is: “Don’t ask us.” According to the Office of the Spokes-person of the Secretary-General, “it is the member states themselves who decide what the member states are.”

After all, what makes a country a country? Membership in the United Nations does not endow universal statehood. Many member states of the UN do not recognize each other: for example, the Czech Republic and Liechtenstein, or South Korea and North Korea. More than 30 UN member states do not recognize Israel; Palestine predicts that it will have 135 recognitions by September, when the General Assembly is set to vote on the issue of Palestinian statehood.

The issue is “poisonously controversial,” as Carne Ross puts it. Mr. Ross, a former British diplomat, is executive director of New York-based Independent Diplomat, a not-for-profit initiative that represents the interests of unrecognized states – entities that for purely political reasons are not allowed to join the club with the exclusive Manhattan address.

It’s controversial because a new member state represents a competitive threat to its neighbours. And it’s poisonous because the ascension of a breakaway nation such as South Sudan (one of Mr. Ross’s clients) to member status in the UN could encourage sovereignty movements within existing member states – a headache for Canada among many other countries.

Like any country club, the UN has its gatekeepers. These are five permanent members of the Security Council – China, France, Russia, the United States and the United Kingdom – each of which has veto power on any substantive issue, including membership. That’s why, should it come this September, a resolution recognizing Palestine statehood would be purely symbolic.

The Montevideo formula

What is a country? The concept is old, but it’s only in the past century that an effort has been made to give firm definition to the status of nationhood. Franklin Delano Roosevelt convened a New World summit in 1933 in Montevideo, Uruguay, in an attempt to counterbalance the old, colonial approach to nation building. The United States, Mexico and 18 nations from Central and South America and the Caribbean attended. (Canada did not.)

According to Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States, a state should possess four qualifications: a permanent population; a defined territory; government; and the capacity to enter relations with other states.

But the Montevideo Convention has never been more than a guideline. As for the four defining characteristics of a state, among member states of the UN, anomalies abound. Moreover, there are many almost-countries that can claim all four qualifications. Quebec, for example, has a permanent population, defined boundaries, a system of government and official delegations in Brussels, London, Mexico City, Munich, New York, Paris and Tokyo.

Permanent population

It sounds simple enough: A group of people living within the same defined geographic area over time will have common cause. This is how the concept of a nation developed. And it’s why islands – England, Japan – make such enduring countries, and have enduring ethnic nationalism.

But in the highly mobile post-Montevideo world, permanence is a subjective term. The population of the Lebanese diaspora is estimated to be three to four times greater than Lebanon’s four million residents; many of these Lebanese expatriates will have the right to vote in the 2013 national elections.

Permanence can also be impossible: Should the Maldives be inundated by rising sea levels, its 300,000 citizens will have no choice but to move. Yet the Maldives presumably would continue to be a member state of the UN.

Or consider the example of the Republic of Poland, occupied by Germany and the Soviet Union in September of 1939. From its base in Paris, and then in London, the Polish government-in-exile maintained a state-like status – with prime ministers and presidents – for 50 years until the collapse of the Soviet Union. In 1990, Lech Walesa, the first post-Soviet president, accepted the symbols of Polish government, including the original 1935 Polish constitution, from the last president-in-exile.

Defined territory

In an op-ed piece last November in The Wall Street Journal, former U.S. ambassador to the UN John Bolton dismissed Palestine’s quest for membership in part because “customary international law’s definition of ‘statehood’ requires that a putative state have clear boundaries.”

Tell that to India and Pakistan, which have been disputing the Kashmir region since partition. If you purchased the (now discontinued) Microsoft Encarta encyclopedia in Pakistan, its map of Kashmir corresponds to Pakistan’s territorial claim. If you bought Encarta in India, the map corresponds to the Indian claim.

Maps are powerful tools in the cause of nationalism. They create what Tom Edwards, a geographer and digital cartographer who helped to design maps for Microsoft, calls “ground truth,” a visual representation as evocative as a portrait of a beloved ancestor.

Government and relations

When Chiang Kai-shek’s Kuomintang decamped to Taiwan in 1950, his nation, the Republic of China, was one of the Earth’s most powerful, holding one of five permanent seats on the UN Security Council along with its crucial veto power. Then, one day in 1971, that seat, and all its power, was transferred to the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan ceased to exist in the eyes of the UN. (Taiwan does exist in the eyes of the World Trade Organization, which refers to it as Chinese Taipei – such is realpolitik.)

Likewise today, the Arab Spring has left many states in flux. Who can be said to represent the government of Libya? Of Egypt? And what of Somalia? Since the civil war began in 1991, the government that is represented at the UN has had control over only a small fraction of its defined territory.

Conversely, consider Somaliland. A vestige of the colonial era, the former British Somaliland, it became an independent state in 1960. Shortly thereafter, the former Italian Somaliland became independent, and the two states were joined. The fractious union was a contributing factor in the Somali Civil War. In 1991, the Somali National Movement seceded from Somalia and declared itself the Republic of Somaliland, claiming the former colonial boundary as its own. But Somalia’s capital remained in Mogadishu and, with it, its UN membership.

Yet, according to Somaliland’s former minister of foreign affairs, Abdillahi Mohamed Duale, his state of four million citizens fits all the criteria of the Montevideo Convention. “We are not creating a new territory. We are reclaiming one that existed in 1960 when the British left and granted independence.”

Unlike Somalia, Somaliland has prevented piracy on its shore. More than 30 UN member states recognize the sovereignty of Somaliland. But none of the permanent five.

On the opposite coast of Africa, Western Sahara has the opposite problem. It is occupied by a neighbour that has a friend on the Security Council. Itself a colonial vestige – formerly Spanish Sahara – Western Sahara has been illegally occupied by the Kingdom of Morocco since 1975. Despite numerous UN-sponsored initiatives, France has reliably undermined Western Sahara’s sovereignty movement.

Do it yourself

Starting a country is easy. “It’s a state of mind,” says Erwin Strauss, author of the seminal 1979 libertarian handbook How To Start Your Own Country. The difficulty is finding land.

There are numerous examples of micro-nations, self-declared sovereign entities that occupy the inevitable interstices of geopolitics. The Principality of Sealand has since 1967 occupied an abandoned Second World War gun tower eight miles off the British coast in the North Sea. Founded in 1970, the Principality of Hutt River Province describes itself as “the second-largest country on the continent of Australia” – about 75 square kilometres. It seceded over a wheat quota.

Sealand and Hutt River each have defined territory, a permanent, albeit small, population and a system of government – they issue passports, postage stamps and currency – and they have interacted with other governments. Both have faced adversity – court battles, political persecution and even military coups – and survived.

But be warned. As Prince Leonard of Hutt River Province puts it: “If you think you can just declare a country and put up a flag and sit back, you’ve got another think coming.”

Denis Seguin is a freelance journalist based in Toronto. He wrote and co-produced the 2010 documentary How to Start Your Own Country.

About Post Author

PaanLuel Wël

administrator

PaanLuel Wël is the founder and editor-in-chief of PaanLuel Wël Media Ltd, a news website that covers news, opinions, analysis, history, culture and literature of South Sudan and the world. Founded in July 2011 by PaanLuel Wël to create a platform for free expression and constructive dialogue, the website features articles from various contributors, including columnists, commentators, poets, authors, activists and academics. PaanLuel Wël believes that media can play a vital role in informing, educating and empowering the people to participate in nation-building and social transformation. He also believes that media can foster a culture of dialogue, tolerance and diversity among different communities and groups, and hopes to inspire and mentor the next generation of South Sudanese writers and journalists.

See author's posts

Tags: How to start a nation south sudan What makes a country?

Latest Posts

South Sudan: How to start a nation