PaanLuel Wel and Ajak Deng Chiengkou Are Spreading Rebel Propaganda
7 min read
March 23, 2015 (SSB) – Allow me to kiss my teeth in disrespect to my dear friend PaanLuel Wel a man I truly respect yet I am very disappointed with him because of many things that have been published on his amazing blog during this senseless war. Useless articles of Propaganda should not come from one of South Sudan’s most historical man with a double major degree in Economics and Philosophy from The George Washington University, Washington D.C, USA.
Please review your page and do not let rebels misuse your respected blog with thanks from Dinka Chick.
SBS radio had got the nerve to call massacres of the citizens of Bor, since ’91 “Dr Riek Machar the Chairman of the SPLM/A in Opposition and Commander in Chief.” So again I kissing my teeth in disappointment to Ajak Deng Chiengkou a journalist of SBS radio who holds a degree in journalism.
The chairman/commander in chief, a job title regarding the of deaths of your people is what Riek is, how can you call Machar a chairman, it is well indeed amazing how one can be paid to say anything and write nonsense without thinking. Make a quick phone call to Bor tomorrow and ask for the title of Riek and they will tell you free of charge. So you think that you are been paid to write fair to both side yet your side should be about not encouraging Riek.
Riek tells you that he wants peace yet he is killing your people which makes you partly, a partner-in-crime, a sell out who is half responsible for recent deaths. I am shocked because of all the atrocities that Machar committed in Bor, and some of the children in Bor are still being lured in Riek’s political and hatred filled net.
‘What is it about Riek Machar’s voice that makes Ajak Deng Chiengkou giggle when he is interviewing one who has ended so many lives?’ In the radio broadcast aired by SBS Radio and hosted by Ajak Deng Chiengkou, Ajak continuously at several points during the broadcast giggles as Riek is speaking and hints during the broadcast to supporting Machar as I quote “you are telling me the truth which is why we came to you.” It is such a shame that during this war we have not only lost lives but even more so intelligence.
Ajak is highly intelligent and holds a degree in journalism but over the time of this conflict himself and many have lost their common sense and intelligence. Ajak was throughout the radio broadcast giving a bias opinion and almost siding with Machar. How can someone laugh, giggle even, at someone who has cost everyone so much including his family. During this conflict many have said lives have been lost, it’s not just that, it has changed how almost everyone thinks.
It is amazing how the massacres of Bor can be talked about casually and even laughed at just to have forty minutes with Dr. Death, it is truly remarkable how many of Satan’s slaves walk among us. A warlord is what Riek is and how he massacres the people of the Republic is somehow amusing for Ajak is not known to myself. I was once asked to be interviewed by SBS Radio but I refused as I was never clear of their true intention to the point that I took a rain-cheque.
However next time he interviews Machar I request I am notified and am involved in the talk with the Bin Laden of South Sudan. I am annoyed that elderlies, women and the disabled were massacred in a hospital in Bor including the relatives of Garang. The analysis: Riek’s army are cowards, per school kids, what are they expecting from people in hospital, armies are made to fight other armies not to kill people who have absolutely no input on the conflict.
What were they trying to show, strength, power? The only thing that it shows is that they are touring the country looking for citizens to kill so that if Riek ever comes into power they can have a country with no people in it to rule. Honestly what did they expect from hospital staff and patients they’re not exactly going to stand up and batter Machar’s army with their walking sticks and ram them down with hospital beds.
Guys have you ever heard a popular expression among you twats, ‘Don’t move and nobody gets hurt’, obviously not what is their excuse for firing, an old lady about 80 was slowly going to the bathroom, she might of come out with a shotgun.
+P.S. After last nights I got an inbox from someone saying that I quote “dear sister, Ajak Deng Ciengkou is not really journalist, he does not have degree in journalism, he got degree in IT which he just completed last yr. he is rebel main representative”
Love ‘n’ Peace Dinka/South Sudan Chick Good night again brother
—-
Dear Daniella Valentino Wol, By Ajak Deng Chiengkou, Australia
You need to keep your anger cool on this sister. There is no reason on this earth that will ever make you to be more angry than me. We are angry for different reasons but we must manage our anger differently. Your affiliation/association to the Government is very visible but you need not to use that as way to silence those doing their jobs. You did to PaanLuel Wël and now Ajak Deng Chiengkou but these people are doing their jobs well as journalists.
You need to know that your anger toward Riek Machar is about his quest for Kiir ‘s leadership but not what you used as trigger to amplifier your anger. Not at any point are you sympathetic or share a real grieve that those affected share but rather a crocodiles tears just to keep the fire of hate burning. That is not the case for others who are able to swallow their pain but put a smile on their faces just to let people know about what caused what and who said what?
Many people seems to have gavanised their main reasons of anger which is about leadership with 1991 but mind you that those whom you are accusing know more than you when its comes to death of civilians. Hiding behind the curtains of 1991 in order to push your agenda or any other person should stop. If the court and call for justice was to be conducted today; i will be the first to demand for the justice to my relatives but you will be sitting laughing.
Riek Machar was a Vice President to Kiir Mayardit for 8 years; when was the last time before 2013 that you called for his prosecution because of his role?
Both 91 and 2013 left a serious pain in the hearts of those who were affected of which iam included but that will never drive a journalist away from the real debates. I still consider alleged accusations on both sides as legal issues but jam not a judge or court either. As i said; you will need to write the same letter to BBC for their interview with Riek and Kiir because you seems to be British but mind less about why and how such stories were aired here.
We broadcasted President Kiir’s speech but you and some of your likes kept silence on what he was saying. We are a news network and our role is to help people know and understand every side of the story that we broadcast and we are good at that unless you need us to be liars by not bring genuine stories from the stakeholders.
What are the reasons available for you that will let us broadcast Kiir’s message but not do the same thing for the man they share table when negotiating peace? I interviewed your brother here who happened to be an ambassador but you were not quick at condemning the allegations that he put forward as government. Don’t you know that your conflict of interest is widely open and known but you chose to use Bor as way of pushing your anger.
That will not sway me and i hope someone tells you that my home village was the epic centre of the 18/12/2013 but i will never be angry at President Kiir or former vice President Riek yet my judgement on who did what is reserved. You need to understand that we are not interested at people but we are interested in stories that we need to relay to our audiences.
Hence; don’t be hypocritical about your assumed anger or sympathy toward the victims. I have the videos of the horrific scenes of what happened in Bor and i have lost people that i love but my instinct tells that you are angry for Riek’ s quest for leadership.
I see nothing in being a stooge of anyone but rather do my job sister Daniella Awut Valentino Akol Wol. Your feedback will be taken into account but remember to separate your anger or be genuine about it too. Wish you well
About Post Author
My advise to you Ajak is this you should not respond to any criticisms that is being directed to you by the listeners of your radio because if you do it you will quit your job. so brother if you get those responses read them and digested them and go on with your jobs. You know any body who is on the lead of something is always prone to criticisms. Also, FYI if you talk to some people like Riek and ask him very sensitive question don’t back out from it if you see that person getting agitated. He is doing because he want to distract you from getting the fact from the question you ask. In your interview this weekend when you interviewed Riek, He said “I was the only one who champion the independent of South Sudan” and then you asked him are those people who fought for the unity Sudan were liars? immediately he got somehow agitated you can hear agitation through his voice You back out from that question and ask different question. you should have explored more to see how he stand on that matter, but you back out from it. next time get the fact out from question you ask. Anyway don’t get yourself be distracted by responses you get just do your jobs. Criticism is part of education. Thanks
these guys are journalists , they are not partisan who take either sides . they must accommodate all views
We have professional ethic in whatever we do, so in rendering our professions, we don’t change reality, but we change the eyes which see the reality for the sake our profession ethic code; we left realities to those who will seek legal grounds.
Mr. Ajak! Continue with your profession eithic code of conducts, you will not work as we thinks, but as your professional ethic guide you.