South Sudan expels head of Chinese-Malaysian oil firm
* South Sudan escalates row with Chinese oil firms
* Petrodar head expelled for lack of cooperation – official
* Chinese firms investigated for helping Sudan seize oil
* China is the biggest buyer of South Sudan’s oil
* Thursday’s talks with Sudan delayed till March 6- official (Adds more quotes, details, background)
By Hereward Holland
PALOUGE OIL FIELD, South Sudan, Feb 21 (Reuters) – South Sudan has expelled the head of Chinese-Malaysian oil consortium Petrodar, the main oil firm operating in the new African nation, a top southern official said on Tuesday, escalating a row between Juba and Chinese oil firms.
South Sudan has repeatedly attacked Chinese oil firms and launched an investigation into whether they helped Khartoum seize southern oil being exported from the landlocked country through Sudan. Juba has shut down its oil output of 350,000 barrels per day to end the seizures, which were sparked off by a dispute over transit fees.
“The (oil) minister has just expelled the president of Petrodar,” said Pagan Amum, South Sudan’s top negotiator for talks with Sudan over oil payments.
“I think one of the reasons is lack of cooperation by the President of Petrodar (with the government) and we have dismissed him and expelled him and we are asking the partners to appoint a new president,” he told Reuters during a visit to the Palouge oil field.
Amum said relations with China were good but there were difficulties with some oil companies.
Petrodar, which pumped 230,000 bpd and exported the southern oil through a Sudan pipeline until the shutdown, categorically rejected the accusations on Sunday and said it had followed only southern instructions.
South Sudan’s attack on Chinese interests is puzzling Western diplomats because China is the biggest buyer of its oil.
Petrodar is a consortium of mainly Chinese state firms Sinopec, Chinese National Petroleum Corp and Malaysia’s Petronas. It runs oil fields in South Sudan’s Upper Nile state, to which Palouge belongs, and also an export pipeline through Sudan.
Many South Sudanese feel bitter about China because of its support for Khartoum during decades of civil war between the Muslim north and mainly Christian South that killed two million people. The conflict ended only in 2005 with a peace agreement that paved the way for southern independence.
OIL TALKS DELAYED
South Sudan took three-quarters of Sudan’s oil production when it became independent in July but needs to export crude through a northern pipeline and a Red Sea port.
Both states have failed to agree on transit fees Juba needs to pay, prompting Khartoum last month to seize at least three southern oil shipments at the Red Sea terminal.
Amum also said oil talks with Sudan scheduled for Thursday would be delayed until March 6.
“On the request of the government of Sudan the talks have been postponed to March 6,” he said.
A spokesman for the Sudanese foreign ministry said he could not confirm the date.
The African Union has been trying to resolve the oil conflict but positions are wide apart. The South wants to pay around $1 a barrel as fee, while Sudan demands $36 a barrel plus $1 billion in rear payments since July.
Apart from oil, north and south also need to solve a long list of other conflicts such as marking the violent border and finding a solution for the disputed border region of Abyei. (Reporting by Hereward Holland; additional reporting by Khalid Abdelaziz; writing by Ulf Laessing; Editing by Marguerita Choy and Keiron Henderson)
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/21/southsudan-china-idUSL5E8DLA7420120221
A Chinese puzzle
Over the past decade, China has done well out of the principle of “non-interference” that governs its foreign policy. An increasing number of countries has engaged with Beijing, encouraged by its stated disinclination to meddle in others’ internal affairs. Today, about 850,000 Chinese work abroad, with many thousands in potentially dangerous corners of Asia, the Middle East and Africa.
Recent events in East Africa are now testing the sustainability of this laid-back doctrine. The dispute between Sudan and South Sudan over how to share oil revenues following Juba’s recent independence has blocked Beijing’s seventh-largest supplier of crude oil. The political chaos in the region has also led to the kidnapping of 29 Chinese workers, causing popular discontent in Beijing.
So far, China has conveniently relied on other countries to intercede for it. The negotiations leading to last year’s peace agreement were largely conducted by a troika formed by the US, UK and Norway. The recent effort to resolve the oil dispute has been led by the African Union (AU).
Unfortunately for Beijing, free-riding is no longer an option. South Sudan’s rejection of the AU’s proposal on how to share oil revenues has discredited it as an effective mediator. As for the US, long-standing sanctions and its involvement in last year’s partition of the country has made its relationship with Khartoum too poisonous for it to have credibility.
This leaves a political gap, which it would be only natural for China to fill. The large loans that Beijing is channelling to Khartoum give China substantial leverage on the Sudanese government. And despite long-standing suspicion between Beijing and Juba, negotiators from South Sudan have conceded that China is a long-term strategic partner for their country.
As escalating economic and political tensions risk a new armed conflict, China’s closer involvement could clearly be desirable for the region. Greater engagement would be in Beijing’s self-interest too.
Non-interference has served China well in giving it an entree to the developing world. But to protect the interests it has fostered, it cannot always hang back and expect others to sort out problems.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/41574dc8-5c8a-11e1-911f-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1n3IY0SG9
| South Sudan expels head of Chinese-Malaysian oil firm Reuters South Sudan escalates row with Chinese oil firms * Petrodar head expelled for lack of cooperation – official * Chinese firms investigated for helping Sudan seize oil * China is the biggest buyer of South Sudan’s oil * Thursday’s talks with Sudan … |
| South Sudan expels head of Chinese-Malaysian oil firm Reuters Africa PALOUGE OIL FIELD, South Sudan, Feb 21 (Reuters) – South Sudan has expelled the head of Chinese-Malaysian oil consortium Petrodar, the main oil firm operating in the new African nation, top southern officials said on Tuesday, escalating a row between … |
| South Sudan fears impact of oil shutdown Financial Times By Katrina Manson in Juba For a country that has just lost 98 per cent of its revenues, South Sudanbarely seems to have noticed. Multi-storey buildings are still going up in its dusty capital of containers and thatch and traders hawk patriotic … |
| North-South Border Peace Conference in Aweil Calls for Assistance AllAfrica.com Juba — A three day peace conference, bringing together communities from either side of the tense border between north Sudan and newly independent South Sudan, has called for international assistance to complement efforts aiming at mitigating border … |
| JobsCash Transfer Project Manager – South Sudan Reuters AlertNet Manage an ECHO-funded project on response to emergency needs of conflict affected people inSouth Sudan, including responsibility for achievement of project objectives and outputs as well as smooth implementation of project activities. |
South Sudan fears impact of oil shutdown
About Post Author
