By Emmanuel Ariech Deng, Juba, South Sudan
April 21, 2017 (SSB) — An idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is general accepted as reality or rational arguments is typically regarded as a symptom of confusion and a risky burden to constructive debates as well as being unprofessional and unethical in writings.
I can’t afford to breach the confidence/trust of my fellow writers on the blog, immediate friends and brothers who have influenced me with powerful comments and advice into my email not to engage with him further more than this.
It is also detrimental to introduce an unethical, unprofessional and nonsensical writer like Achier to the blog. His rampancy and inconsistency on the items he had chosen to emphasize, revealed a wide range of issues over unfounded allegations and equally unnecessary to the point of contention.
He is not the only man who knows better than others do, when it comes to privacy, job experience, academics and natural ability. The judgment will still dwindle between the two articles and many more I had written for this website as I continue with my extensive writing contributions on concrete issues of common concerns for South Sudan and beyond.
So his deviation from reasonable writing debate, professional ethics and false agonistic abuses and more imperatively, your esteemed interventions requesting me to withdraw is now accepted! Not on assumption that he can independently manage to win it without plagiarism and assists at the background.
Please! Kindly accept the assurance of my highest regards and consideration!